Education · Seattle-Tacoma, WA Metro · September 9, 2026
WA Father Sues District After School Denied Opt-Out From LGBTQ Lessons
A Washington father has filed a federal lawsuit against Lake Washington School District after officials refused to let his 10-year-old son opt out of LGBTQ-related instruction, according to Fox News. Konstantin Averkiev, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom, said he asked his son's teacher at Henry David Thoreau Elementary School for advance notice and an opt-out from gender identity and LGBTQ lessons in September 2025. The teacher agreed, but Averkiev later learned his son had sat through a June Pride Month lesson that allegedly included classroom discussion of gender-change surgery, same-sex attraction, transgender identity, and the Stonewall uprising. As his son entered fifth grade, the district rejected nearly all of Averkiev's renewed opt-out requests — including from counseling sessions and pronoun use conflicting with his beliefs — granting exemptions only for sex-education and health surveys already mandated under state law. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday, alleges violations of the First and 14th Amendments. ADF senior counsel Kate Anderson said parents have a constitutional right to direct their children's religious upbringing even within public schools.
Source: Fox News
Watch the briefing
Listen to the briefing instead
Why Bible-Believing Christians Should Care
Scripture teaches that parents, not the state, bear primary responsibility for a child's moral and spiritual formation (Deuteronomy 6:6-7; Ephesians 6:4). This case tests whether a public school can compel a 10-year-old to receive instruction on gender-transition surgery and pronoun mandates over a parent's explicit religious objection, after initially agreeing to accommodate him. Christians should recognize this as part of a broader pattern: districts embedding gender-identity ideology into elementary curricula while narrowing religious opt-outs to only what state law strictly requires. Whatever the court decides on constitutional grounds, the underlying conflict is not merely legal — it is between a biblical view of the body, sex, and marriage and an ideology now presented as settled fact in public classrooms. Parents in similar districts should not assume a verbal agreement with a teacher will be honored district-wide.
And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children — Deuteronomy 6:6-7
Share this alert
From the book
The most potent weapon against parents is Rule 3. Educators reframe moral and cultural questions as technical or medical ones. A dispute over explicit material becomes a matter of library science. A dispute over gender identity becomes a matter of mental health best practice. The activist tells the parent he is not an educator, using the appeal to authority to sever the parent's confidence in his own judgment.
— Chapter 19, “Capture in K-12”
Get the BookKnow where you stand
The free 4-minute assessment identifies your mountain and your institution’s capture phase — so alerts like this one arrive matched to where you actually stand.
Facing this yourself? Ask. Describe what is happening and get what the book, Scripture, and the law of your state say, with the exact words to use. Your first one is free.