Religion · Myrtle Beach, SC Metro · October 8, 2026

SC Church, Academy Seek Dismissal of Suit Over Sex Offender Volunteer

SC Church, Academy Seek Dismissal of Suit Over Sex Offender Volunteer
Status: HighSeverity: 2 - Directly Affects

Pawleys Island Community Church and its affiliated academy have asked a South Carolina judge to dismiss a lawsuit stemming from a volunteer's criminal sex offender status, according to WPDE. The motion invokes the First Amendment and the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, which generally bars courts from reviewing internal church governance decisions. The case follows criminal charges against multiple people connected to the church: volunteer Warren Perry, charged with criminal conspiracy and obstruction; Ginny Williams, who held an administrative role at the church, charged with criminal conspiracy and obstruction; and Niki Howard, charged with unlawfully placing a child at risk or willfully abandoning a child, conspiracy, criminal conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. WPDE's report does not detail the specific underlying facts of the abuse allegations or the full scope of the civil complaint. What is established: criminal charges have been filed against church-connected individuals, and the church and academy are now arguing in civil court that the First Amendment shields their internal decisions from judicial review.

Source: WPDE

Watch the briefing

Listen to the briefing instead

Why Bible-Believing Christians Should Care

Bible-believing Christians should watch closely when a church invokes constitutional doctrine to avoid scrutiny over child safety rather than pursuing full transparency. Ecclesiastical abstention exists to protect churches from government interference in doctrine and ministerial decisions — not to shield institutions from accountability when children may have been placed at risk. Scripture places severe weight on the protection of children and the integrity of those entrusted with their care. Congregations and academies that claim biblical authority must not use legal doctrine as a substitute for honest answers about how a known or suspected offender gained access to children, and how leadership responded once concerns arose.

But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. — Matthew 18:6

Share this alert

From the book

In the case studies of captured institutions, leadership usually failed not for lack of information but for fear of losing status. They feared being called bigots more than they feared compromising the truth.

— Chapter 17, “The Mandate of Courage”

Get the Book

Know where you stand

The free 4-minute assessment identifies your mountain and your institution’s capture phase — so alerts like this one arrive matched to where you actually stand.

Facing this yourself? Ask. Describe what is happening and get what the book, Scripture, and the law of your state say, with the exact words to use. Your first one is free.

Take the Free AssessmentAsk about your situation

People in this situation also ask