Media · Nationwide · August 20, 2026
Denmark Publishes Public Ban List Naming 17 Foreign Preachers, Including 3 Americans
According to YEN.com.gh, Danish immigration authorities have published an official sanctions list identifying 17 foreign religious preachers barred from entering Denmark over stated "public order concerns." The publicly accessible list includes each person's full name, birth date, nationality, residence, and ban duration, each running for a uniform two-year term. Three of the individuals named hold U.S. nationality: Khalifah At-Thahabi (also known as Frankie Lipscomb), banned starting March 2026; Abdur-Raheem McCarthy, a U.S. national residing in the United Kingdom, banned from July 2026; and Mohamad Baajour, banned from August 2026. The remaining names span Turkish, British, Zimbabwean, Iranian, Saudi, Pakistani, Egyptian, Syrian, and Jordanian nationals, with Turkish citizens forming the largest group. The article does not identify the religious tradition of the preachers named, though the names and public-order rationale suggest these are Islamic religious figures rather than Christian ministers. No further detail on the specific conduct triggering each ban is provided in the source.
Source: Legit News
Why Bible-Believing Christians Should Care
This story does not concern Christian preachers or biblical doctrine; the individuals named appear to be Islamic religious figures barred by Denmark for public-order reasons unrelated to Christianity. Still, believers should take note of the underlying principle: a Western government is now maintaining a public national registry naming, photographing, and banning religious speakers by name, based on its own judgment of "public order." Christians in the West should watch how such immigration and speech-control mechanisms develop, since a government willing to build this kind of apparatus for one religious group has already built the tool that could, under different political conditions, be turned against orthodox Christian preachers as well.
Share this alert
From the book
The activist relies on picking a target to isolate and destroy a specific leader. If he can remove the strong bishop or the vocal pastor, the rest fall in line. The answer is the shield wall, and the reasoning is set out in full at Counter-Rule 13. What matters here is the ecclesial application: the institution has to stand with a targeted leader immediately and publicly, and it must never remove him to appease a mob.
— Chapter 17, “Defensive Strategy”
Get the BookKnow where you stand
The free 4-minute assessment identifies your mountain and your institution’s capture phase — so alerts like this one arrive matched to where you actually stand.
Facing this yourself? Ask. Describe what is happening and get what the book, Scripture, and the law of your state say, with the exact words to use. Your first one is free.