Government · Statewide · MA · October 1, 2026
Red-State AGs Challenge Massachusetts Abortion Shield Law at Supreme Court
What Alinsky tactic is being used
2 of the thirteen rules are in play here — campaigns rarely run just one.
Rule 3
“Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”
The fight has been deliberately relocated onto ground where the banning states' ordinary tools stop working. Massachusetts-style shield laws treat a telehealth encounter with a patient in another state as a local one, and California and New York have refused two Louisiana extradition requests outright — so the contest is no longer about abortion but about extradition, full faith and credit, the dormant Commerce Clause and the Court's original jurisdiction, where a district attorney's warrant is useless. That is why three AGs had to file a 67-page bill of complaint in Washington rather than prosecute at home.
Counter-Rule 3 · Preparation and Width
Prepare the unfamiliar ground before you are dragged onto it. "I don't know, I'll find out and come back" beats an improvised answer.
Before speaking at any meeting this month, read two things: the actual text of your own state's shield statute (Guttmacher's state table links them) and the news accounts of what the three AGs actually pleaded — Full Faith and Credit, equal sovereignty, federal common-law public nuisance, dormant Commerce Clause. Learn what a 'motion for leave to file a bill of complaint' is, since the Court may simply decline it as it declined Texas v. Pennsylvania in 2020. When asked something jurisdictional you don't know, say 'I don't know, I'll find out' and come back with the docket entry.
Rule 10
“The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.”
Shield laws work by attrition rather than by any single victory: 23 states and D.C. now have some form of protection, eight of them covering telehealth into other states, and Guttmacher counted 91,000 telehealth abortions provided into total-ban states in 2025, including 9,360 into Louisiana. No one ruling undoes that; the pills keep moving while the litigation runs. The red-state suit is itself the counter-pressure, and it will be years in the answering.
Counter-Rule 10 · The Long Game
Plan in decades against a campaign built on attrition. Succession and endurance beat any single victory.
Plan past this case. Subscribe to the docket by email at supremecourt.gov so you are reading filings rather than headlines, and write down now what your group will still be doing in 2030 regardless of how the Court rules — who funds the pregnancy center, who trains the next volunteers, who handles a woman who has already taken pills. Name a successor for whatever role you hold. Refuse to treat a cert-stage order as the end of the matter in either direction.
Chapter 3 sets out the rules; Chapter 15 answers each of them in turn. This is that pairing applied to this story.
Know where you stand
The free 4-minute assessment identifies your mountain and your institution’s capture phase — so alerts like this one arrive matched to where you actually stand.
Facing this yourself? Ask. Describe what is happening and get what the book, Scripture, and the law of your state say, with the exact words to use. Your first one is free.