Government · Statewide · IN · September 9, 2026
Indiana Supreme Court to Hear Bid to Use Religious Liberty Against Abortion Ban
The Indiana Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case brought by the ACLU of Indiana challenging the state's abortion ban on religious freedom grounds, according to the ACLU of Indiana. The organization represents plaintiffs whose "sincerely held religious beliefs" they say would direct them to terminate a pregnancy in circumstances the state's near-total abortion ban prohibits. Earlier rulings in the case produced a preliminary injunction, which the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed, and later a permanent injunction barring enforcement of the ban against the named plaintiffs and a certified class whose faith claims conflict with the law. The ACLU frames the case as protecting religious exercise from government interference. The full list of plaintiffs' specific religious traditions and the Supreme Court's hearing date were not detailed in the ACLU's announcement. This marks the case's move to the state's highest court after lower-court rulings favored the challengers, with statewide implications for how Indiana's abortion law applies going forward.
Source: ACLU of Indiana
Watch the briefing
Listen to the briefing instead
Why Bible-Believing Christians Should Care
This case inverts the religious liberty argument Christians have long relied on to protect conscience: here it is used to carve out a right to abortion, not to protect it. If courts accept that a religious claim can override a law protecting unborn human life, the same reasoning could later be turned against pro-life institutions, hospitals, and pregnancy centers acting on their own convictions. Scripture teaches that human life in the womb is known and formed by God, not a matter of subjective belief exempted case by case. Christians should watch this ruling closely, since a favorable outcome for the ACLU would establish that "religious freedom" can be wielded to dismantle protections for the unborn rather than to defend the free exercise of biblical conviction.
Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee — Jeremiah 1:5
Share this alert
From the book
The primary weapon here is the weaponization of civil rights language. Activists hold the government to its stated commitment to equal protection, then redefine equality, meaning equal treatment under law, as equity, meaning equal outcomes. By holding the agency to the new definition they turn the machinery of justice into an engine of social engineering.
— Chapter 20, “The Anatomy of Capture”
Get the BookKnow where you stand
The free 4-minute assessment identifies your mountain and your institution’s capture phase — so alerts like this one arrive matched to where you actually stand.
Facing this yourself? Ask. Describe what is happening and get what the book, Scripture, and the law of your state say, with the exact words to use. Your first one is free.