← Field Cases

Field Case 13 · The Family Mountain

“The Addendum”

Family Mountain — October third at five o'clock, a foster mother's license renewal arrives with one new page.

The words to use

“I'll care for any child you place with us and never mistreat one. I can't sign a belief my faith forbids. Please show me in writing which duty requires it.”

Calm, courteous, on the record. Write it down before you need it.

The technique

A conviction is reclassified as job conduct and slipped into routine paperwork, so refusing to believe looks like refusing to care for children.

Your move

Separate conduct from creed in writing, ask the agency which duty of care requires the belief, and tell a brother and an elder before the clock runs out.

The case, as told

The situation

Diane isn't a real person. She's a composite, built from cases that look like hers, and the details are ordinary on purpose. She's forty-four. She works part-time at a preschool, and her husband Paul drives a delivery route. Six years ago the county licensed their home for foster care. Eleven children have slept under their roof since. Right now there are two, a boy who is seven and his sister who is four, and they have been in the same bunk beds for eighteen months, riding the same church van on Wednesday nights. On September twenty-second the annual renewal packet came by email from the licensing specialist. Three attachments. Two of them Diane has signed before, the safety checklist and the medical consent form. The third one is new. It is called the Affirming Care Addendum, and the sentence in the middle of it reads: I affirm and will support each child's gender identity as the child expresses it, including name, pronouns, and social transition, and I will not expose any child in my care to teaching or materials that question that identity. Signatures are due October third at five o'clock. And then the line that does the real work, written in the same flat tone as everything else: This is a standard renewal document. Unsigned renewals cannot be processed, and children placed in homes whose license lapses must be transitioned. Read that again. If Diane refuses, she isn't the one who pays first. A seven-year-old is, in a hallway where he finally learned to sleep through the night.

The technique

Look closely at what that page actually asks. It does not ask Diane to feed a child, protect a child, or speak to a child with kindness. She already does all of that, and nobody has complained about her home in six years. It asks her to affirm. It asks her to hold a belief about what a human being is, and to promise that the teaching in her house will never question it. In the book, William Green's Rules for Radical Christians, that move has a name. It's the conviction redefined as conduct. Your faith is not attacked. Your faith is reclassified as a job performance standard, so that declining it looks like refusing to do the work instead of refusing to change what you believe. And notice where the page was put. Not in a letter. Not in a meeting. It was stapled into the middle of a routine renewal, between the fire extinguisher checklist and the pediatrician's form, so that signing it feels like housekeeping and questioning it feels like making a scene. That's the second half of the technique, and the book calls it what it is: the demand hidden inside the ordinary. Then the clock. Eleven days, and no name attached to the change, no author, no policy number, no person who will admit to writing it. A deadline that short doesn't test your character. It prevents your deliberation. And the price of speaking is set higher than any reasonable person would pay, because the price is not Diane's comfort. It's two children in the back of a car. When the cost is raised that high, silence stops feeling like cowardice and starts feeling like love. That is exactly what it is engineered to feel like.

The temptation

Tuesday night, ten o'clock, kitchen table. Both children asleep. Paul is on a late route. Diane has the form open on the laptop and the cursor is sitting in the signature box, and here come the voices, and every one of them sounds like wisdom. It's just paper. Nobody will ever read it. God knows your heart. And if you don't sign, some other home gets them, maybe a worse one, and what good did your principle do then? Sign now, and just keep raising them right. Every one of those lines has a grain of truth in it, and that's the danger. God does know her heart. A worse placement is genuinely possible. She really would keep loving those children either way. But a promise is not measured by whether anyone reads it. It is measured by whether it is true when you make it. Diane would be swearing to a belief she does not hold, and swearing that her own home will never teach what her church teaches. That isn't paper. That's her word, and her house. There was a king who faced the same clock. Saul stood at Gilgal, waiting for Samuel, and the days ran out, and the people scattered, and he took the sacrifice into his own hands. His explanation was almost sympathetic. I forced myself therefore, and offered a burnt offering. He didn't rebel. He just ran out of time, and did the thing the moment required. The deadline was real. It still cost him the kingdom.

Your move

Change the ground the fight is on. Diane is being offered two doors, sign or abandon two children, and both doors were built by the same hand. So she opens a third one. She doesn't debate anybody's identity. She separates conduct from creed, out loud and in writing, and she puts the burden back where it belongs, on the agency, to say which duty of care actually requires a belief. On Wednesday morning she replies to the licensing specialist, courteous, short, and copied to herself. Here are the words. I'll care for any child you place with us and never mistreat one. I can't sign a belief my faith forbids. Please show me in writing which duty requires it. Then she asks three plain questions in the same email. Who wrote this addendum, which written policy or regulation requires it, and is a religious accommodation available, since her objection is a sincerely held religious conviction. Recognized concepts, asked politely, on the record. She does not improvise in a phone call. Second move. Before Friday, she tells Paul and she tells an elder at her church exactly what she will and will not sign, and she says the date out loud. That's pre-commitment. The reason to do it early is simple. At four fifty on Friday afternoon, alone, with a cursor blinking, a person can talk himself into anything. A person who has already told two people what he will do has to lie to them first. Third move. Keep being excellent. The mileage log stays current. The dentist appointments stay kept. The seven-year-old keeps his reading tutor. If anyone ever reviews this home, let the only unusual thing in the entire file be one respectful email asking a question nobody wants to answer.

Scripture & close

Hear the word of God, from the Epistle of James, chapter one, verse twenty-seven. Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world. Both halves. Take in the child, and stay clean. You are not asked to choose between them, and when someone tells you that you must, that is the moment to ask who set up the choice. This is the Family Mountain. If this is happening to you, Ask: rules for radical christians dot com, slash ask. Your first one is free. And to know which of the seven mountains you are standing on, take the free assessment at rules for radical christians dot com, slash start. Stand your ground. We'll see you on the wall.

“Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.”
— James 1:27 (KJV)

This case illustrates the School’s Family Mountain module. Open the module →

The people in this case are fictional composites. The technique is real.

Share this columnFacebookXEmail

People in this situation also ask